Journals
Present Issue
Past Issues
THESMANEWS
Present
Issue
Past Issues
SMJ Editorial Board
Letters to the Editor |
S I N G A P O R E M E D I
C A L J O U R N A L
This site is supported by Health
ONE
Depression of Young and
Elderly Patients
S M Ko, E H Kua, M H Chow
ABSTRACT
Objective: To compare the presentation and outcome of depression
between young and elderly patients.
Design: The clinical presentation, treatment and outcome of
47 young patients (21 to 64 years) were compared with 58 elderly (65 years
and older) patients admitted to a general hospital psychiatric ward for
the treatment of depressive disorders (based on ICD-10).
Subjects: There was no significant difference between the sexes
in each age group. The majority of the elderly were either widowed (36%)
or married (53%) while 45% of the young were single and 51% married. Seventy
per cent of the elderly had retired while 64% of the young were in full-time
employment. Most patients lived with their families (87% young and 96%
elderly). All but one elderly suffered at least one physical disorder with
two-thirds having two or more physical disorders; this contrasts greatly
to young patients who were physically healthier (p<0.001).
Results: In clinical presentation and symptomatology, the young
patients had significantly more suicide ideation (p<0.003) and psychomotor
retardation (p<0.001) but there was no difference in suicidal attempt,
delusion, hallucination or agitation. More young patients (36%) had a past
psychiatric illness (often depressive disorders) than elderly patients
(8%) (p<0.001), more elderly patients (88%) were treated with antidepressants
than the young patients (62%) (p<0.002). At one year follow-up, more
elderly patients (46%) recovered compared with the young patients (23%)
(p<0.05).
Conclusion: There were some differences in the symptomatology
of depression between young and elderly patients, but the prognosis was
better for elderly patients.
Keywords: depression, young, elderly, outcome
INTRODUCTION
Depressive disorders are common psychiatric conditions in both out-patients
and in-patients as well as among young and elderly patients. In a study
of 343 new adult admissions to the psychiatric unit of a general hospital
in Singapore, more than a fifth (22.2%) were diagnosed to have Neurotic
Depression(1) based
on the International Classification of Disease 9th Revision. This excluded
another 7.2% with Manic Depressive Psychosis. A retrospective study of
100 consecutive geriatric patients again showed a predominance of depressive
disorders (36%)(2).
Similarly, a community study among elderly Chinese in Singapore reported
a prevalence of 4.6%(3)
which is commoner than dementia (prevalence of 2.6%). Despite their significant
prevalence, clinicians in general have a poor knowledge of depression as
a disorder, especially among the elderly(4).
This state is made worse when a major cause of suicide is associated with
depression. Follow-up studies of adults with depression showed dismal results
with only 20% remaining continuously well, while 63% recovered but had
subsequent relapses and 17% remained chronically incapacitated or had died
by suicide(5,6).
Similarly, a 5-year follow-up of 31 depressed elderly Chinese in the community
showed that a third remained depressed, a quarter recovered while the remainder
developed an anxiety disorder, dementia, or had died(7).
This retrospective study illustrates the differences in the presentation
of depressive disorders among young (21 to 64 years) and elderly adults
(65 years and above), as well as the outcome at one year follow-up.
METHODS AND MATERIALS
Consecutive cases of new adult admissions in two different age groups
( young - 21 to 65 years old, old - 65 years and above) for the treatment
of depressive disorders to the general psychiatric ward in a general hospital
were included in this study. Information gathered included diagnosis (based
on the International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision(8),
sex, living arrangement, symptomatology, marital status, employment, presence
of physical disorder (which had active signs or symptoms, or those requiring
on-going medical surveillance), predominant area of stress, treatment and
outcome at one year follow-up. The criteria for clinical outcome was modelled
after E Murphy’s(9)
and are as follows:
a) Recovered: This group include those with an absence of symptoms
or with minor symptoms which were not at all distressing.
b) Relapsed: This was defined as a return of symptoms which fulfilled
the ICD-10 criteria following an apparent clinical recovery from the first
episode at admission.
c) Continuously ill: These patients retained their symptoms of
depression throughout most part of the study period with only minor fluctuations
in severity.
d) Defaulted: These patients were either lost to follow-up and
could not be contacted, or else refused to participate in further review
for re-assessment.
A year after admission, the patients were reviewed. For those who did
not turn up for re-assessment, telephone calls were made to advise their
return.
RESULTS
There were 47 young (21 to 64 years) and 58 elderly (65 years and older)
patients of whom 44 (42%) were men and 61 (58%) were women. There was no
significant difference between the sexes of each age group. The majority
of the elderly were either widowed (n=21, 36%) or married (n=31,53%) while
45% (n=21) of the young were unmarried and 51% (n=24) married; 2 elderly
and 2 young patients were divorced. Seventy per cent of the elderly had
retired while 64% of the young were in full-time employment. Most patients
lived with their families (87% among the young and 96% among the elderly).
All but one elderly suffered at least one physical disorder with two-thirds
having two or more physical disorders; this contrasts greatly to young
patients where one in six had co-existing physical disorders (p<0.001).
In their clinical presentation and symptomatology, the young patients
had significantly more suicide ideation (p<0.003) and psychomotor retardation
(p<0.001) but there was no difference in suicidal attempt, delusion,
hallucination or agitation (Table I).
Although more elderly (48%) than young (38%) patients experienced family
stress, this was not statistically significant. Four out of every 10 young
patients had significant work stress (as most were in full-time employment)
but working elderly did not complain about work stress. Four times more
young patients (n=17, 36%) had a past psychiatric illness (often depressive
disorders) than elderly patients (n=5, 8%) (p<0.001); more of the latter
group (n=50, 88%) were treated with anti-depressants (n=29, 62% for the
young patients) (p<0.002). Electro-convulsive therapy was administered
to 3 young and 5 elderly patients. Although one in five young and one in
three elderly patients stayed beyond two weeks, the majority (75%) in both
groups were discharged within 2 weeks. At one year follow-up, more elderly
patients (n=25, 43%) recovered while more young patients (n=11, 23%) had
relapses (p<0.05) (Table II).
DISCUSSION
In a study of depression in various adult age groups, Gurland(10)
found no clear distinction in symptomatology between elderly and younger
patients, except for more frequent somatic complaints in the former. In
our present study, the young patients seemed to exhibit more severe depression
with suicide ideation and psychomotor retardation. It is possible that
the younger patients who were mildly depressed and less disturbed could
have been managed as out-patients while the mildly to moderately depressed
elderly patients could have caused more distress to their care-givers and
therefore were referred for admissions. Moreover, most of the young were
working (n=30, 64%) compared to the elderly (n=2, 3%), thus admission could
have affected their work adversely, especially if more than two weeks of
hospitalisation was necessary. In addition, the young were physically healthier,
while all but one elderly patient had at least one significant physical
disorder and 34 (60%) suffered from at least two. This could have also
contributed to greater disability and that necessitated in-patient care.
Common physical disorders included visual impairment eg. cataract, musculoskeletal
disorders eg. osteoarthritis, diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and chronic
obstructive airway diseases. As this was a retrospective study, no rating
scale was used to assess the severity of the depressive disorders.
There were 18 (38%) young and 26 (45%) elderly men and 29 ( 62%) young
and 32 (55%) elderly women in the present study. Nineteen (40%) young patients
attributed a major cause of their depression to work stress especially
among the men, while both groups (38% young and 48% old) had experienced
family conflicts as a contributory factor to their mood state. Family conflicts
were a commoner reason for seeking help in women and work stress in men.
As men retired from their work and spent more time with the family, this
could be a double-edged sword in enhancing relationship at home, but there
would be more contact opportunities for greater conflicts if they had poor
relationships at home even before retirement.
Traditional teaching has often emphasised the relatively good prognosis
of mood disorders (especially depressive disorders) compared to schizophrenic
ones which often run a chronic course, punctuated in between with frequent
relapses. However, depressive disorders in old age are often characterised
by frequent and prolonged relapse. An early study by Post(11)
reported that after 3 years, only 26% had made a good and sustained recovery,
37% had a recurrence with subsequent recovery, 25% had recurrent attacks
in the setting of chronic, mild depression and 12% were continuously ill
throughout the follow-up period. Ten years later, Milliard(12),
concluded that the rule of thirds applies: no matter what is done, one-third
get better, one-third stay the same and one-third get worse. More recent
review by Cole(13),
using the MacMaster validity criteria with an average follow-up period
of 32 months showed that at least 60% of the combined 990 subjects in 10
methodologically adequate studies had remained well or had had relapses
with recovery. However, 25% remained continuously ill. Similarly, a 5-year
follow-up study of 612 depressed elderly Chinese living in the community
in Singapore by Kua(7),
reported that 32% were still depressed, 26% had recovered with the most
developing anxiety disorders, dementia or categorised as subcases of depression
using the GMS-AGECAT package.
It is estimated that more than 60% of older persons with depression
are inappropriately or inadequately treated, and once recognised, depression
is as treatable in old people as in the young(14).
The present study showed a more favourable response among the old than
young patients. Firstly, this could be due to the severity of the depressive
disorders mentioned above with the young suffering more severe ones. Almost
half (n=25, 43%) of the old patients recovered, a sixth (n=10, 17%) remained
continuously unwell, and an eighth (n=7, 12%) had relapses. This contrasts
with the young with almost a third (n=15, 32%) recovered, 3 (6%) continuously
unwell and 11 (23%) relapsed. Secondly, a history of past psychiatric illnesses
was commoner in the young (n=17, 36%) than old (n=5, 9%) (p<0.001).
This could have contributed adversely to the young patients in coping with
the present episode of depression. Thirdly, most elderly reported family
conflicts as a major cause of the depression whereas for the young, it
was both family and work stress. At a younger age, work is likely to continue
to be a persistent source as well as a major one in their lives. Finally,
more elderly patients (n=50, 88%) were treated with anti-depressant than
the young (n=29, 62%). As this is a retrospective study, it is difficult
to postulate why, except that perhaps older patients often expect their
clinicians, including psychiatrists, to prescribe them medication after
their consultations. Also, the young ones, especially when the depression
is a result of psychosocial stress, would prefer non-pharmacological treatment
like psychotherapy. Although psychological therapies are definitely efficacious,
if the stressors persisted and the patients were unable to continue regular
follow-up at frequent intervals, it could lead to persistence of their
depressive symptoms as well. As shown on Table
II, 18 (38%) of young patients defaulted while only 11 (19%) of the
elderly had done so. This is unfortunate, as depressive disorders can impede
both personal and social functioning of the sufferers, whether young or
old.
|