S I N G A P O R E M E D I
C A L J O U R N A L
This site is supported by Health
ONE
Urological Injuries in Gynaecological Practice - When
is the Optimal Time for Repair?
Y Soong, P H C Lim
ABSTRACT
Objective: This is a retrospective study to determine differences
in outcome and prognosis between patients with urological injuries treated
immediately within 30 days by definitive repair and those in whom definitive
treatment was delayed.
Subjects: Patients who sustained urinary tract injuries after
gynaecological surgery and who were subsequently referred to the Urological
Department of (former) Toa Payoh Hospital during the period 1985-1991.
Results: There were nine injuries sustained in eight patients:
six to the ureters and three to the bladder. One patient had a double injury:
a vesico-vaginal fistula and a uretero-vaginal fistula. There were six
patients whose injuries were repaired within 30 days of the primary gynaecological
operation. They stayed an average of 10-14 days in hospital and were discharged
well. They were well both clinically and radiologically on follow-up. Two
patients had initial drainage before definitive surgery was undertaken.
One patient recovered fully but had to endure the morbidity of a prolonged,
3-month hospital stay. The other patient treated by simple diathermy for
her vesico-vaginal fistula, never fully recovered, and subsequently defaulted
follow-up.
Conclusion: The old dictum of waiting 3 to 6 months to allow
oedema to subside, tissue planes to be re-established and the fistula to
become smaller, before repair is attempted, should be reviewed. Recently
acquired fistulae may be repaired definitively soon after diagnosis of
the problem, with good results in competent hands, as supported in this
series of patients studied. This shortens the length of hospital stay for
the patients and alleviates much of the morbidity endured.
Keywords: urological injuries, gynaecological surgery, early
repair
INTRODUCTION
One of the major concerns of the gynaecologist during gynaecological
procedures is damage to the urinary tract. Fortunately, this is a rare
complication: the incidence being 0.5% - 1% of all pelvic operations(1).
Accidental injury can be a perplexing problem, both to the patient
and to the gynaecologist, when it occurs. Difficult convalescence with
prolonged hospital stay and additional surgical treatment increases the
post-operative morbidity of the patient.
Much discussion has been made about the diagnosis and surgical repair
of these injuries. However, there have been few reports on the differences
in outcomes and prognosis between patients with injuries diagnosed and
treated immediately by definitive repair and those in whom definitive treatment
was delayed with initial drainage being undertaken first. This study looks
at the timing of definitive surgery to the urological injuries sustained
and describes a better outcome for patients who had their injuries treated
early compared to those in whom definitive repair was delayed.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
A retrospective review of iatrogenic urological injuries due to gynaecological
surgery was done for a 6-year period, between 1985 and 1991, in the Urological
Department of the former Toa Payoh Hospital, Singapore. This was a specialised
urological unit which receives referred cases from various hospitals in
Singapore, both from the private and government subsidised hospitals. There
were 8 female patients with 9 injuries. Their ages ranged from 44 - 52
years with a mean age of 45 years. The surgeons who performed the definitive
repair were all urologists. There were six ureteric injuries and three
bladder injuries. The level of specialist performing the gynaecological
operations were of different grades ranging from registrars to senior consultants.
Case 1
This 46-year-old patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy performed for uterine fibroids. She presented three
weeks after the primary operation, complaining of abdominal pain and abdominal
distension. The histology reported a cut segment from the ureter, in addition
to the hysterectomy specimen. An intravenous pyelogram, cystoscopy and
retrograde pyelogram were performed, showing transection of a segment of
the right ureter at the level of the fifth lumbar vertebrae.
She had a laparotomy four weeks from the primary operation. A definitive
re-implantation of the proximal ureter into the bladder with the aid of
a Boari-Ockerblad flap and a psoas hitch was done. A double-J stent was
placed in-situ and removed two months later. She stayed 12 days in hospital
after the definitive repair. She was reviewed a month later and was asymptomatic
and had a normal intravenous pyelogram. She is well to date.
Case 2
This 44-year-old patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy for uterine fibroids. She presented 10 days after
the primary operation complaining of leaking per vaginum and urinary incontinence.
An intravenous pyelogram and cystoscopy were performed showing a mid to
hich vesico-vaginal fistula.
A decision to manage her conservatively with an indwelling Foley’s
catheter for bladder drainage was made. This was done for six weeks but
the fistula failed to heal. Cystodiathermy of the fistulous tract between
the bladder and vagina was then performed cystoscopically. The patient
stayed a total of 53 days in hospital. She was reviewed a month later with
persistent leaking per vaginum on and off. She subsequently defaulted follow-up.
Case 3
This 52-year-old patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy performed for uterine fibroids. She presented three
weeks post-operation, complaining of soiling of her perineum on and off.
An intravenous pyelogram and cystoscopy performed showed a low left uretero-vaginal
fistula due to a ligature.
She had a laparotomy four weeks from the primary operation. A definitive
re-implantation of the proximal ureter into the bladder with the aid of
a Boari-Ockerblad flap was done. A double-J stent was placed in-situ which
was removed two months later. She stayed for 14 days in hospital and was
discharged well. She was seen one month later and was asymptomatic. An
intravenous pyelogram done was normal. She was well a year later.
Case 4
This 44-year-old patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy performed
for uterine fibroids. She presented three weeks later, complaining of leaking
per vaginum. An intravenous pyelogram, a cystoscopy and a micturating cystogram
done, showed a high vesico-vaginal fistula.
She had definitive surgery done four weeks from the primary operation.
A trans-peritoneal approach to repair the fistula with the aid of a mobilised
vascularised omental pedicle was done. She stayed for 14 days in hospital.
She was seen a month later and was noted to be asymptomatic. She had both
normal intravenous pyelogram and micturating cystogram. However, she developed
a stitch sinus formation over the abdominal incision which was subsequently
excised and repaired.
Case 5
This 49-year-old patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy performed for cervical fibroids impacted in the lower
segment. She presented two weeks later complaining of urinary incontinence.
An intravenous pyelogram, a cystoscopy, a retrograde pyelogram and a micturating
cystogram were done which showed a right uretero-vaginal fistula caused
by a ligature and a concurrent high vesico-vaginal fistula.
She had a trans-peritoneal repair of the fistulae three weeks from
the primary operation. The proximal ureter was re-implanted with the aid
of a Boari flap and the vesico-vaginal fistula was repaired with the aid
of a vascularised omental pedicle flap. She stayed 14 days in hospital
and was well on discharge. She was seen a month later and was asymptomatic,
had a normal intravenous pyelogram and micturating cystogram and a normal
ultrasound of the kidneys. She was well 9 months later.
Case 6
This 45-year-old patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy performed
for uterine fibroids. She presented two weeks later, complaining of urinary
incontinence and dysuria. An intravenous pyelogram, a cystoscopy, a retrograde
pyelogram and a urinanalysis done, showed urinary tract infection and a
left uretero-vaginal fistula due to a ligature.
She had a laparotomy four weeks from the hysterectomy, after her urinary
tract infection was treated. A definitive re-implantation of the proximal
ureter into the bladder was done with the aid of a Boari-Ockerblad flap.
She stayed 10 days in hospital and was well on discharge. She was asymptomatic
a month later and had a normal intravenous pyelogram. She also had a normal
ultrasound of the kidneys. She was well 3 years later.
Case 7
This 44-year-old patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy performed
for uterine fibroids. She complained of abdominal pain and distension on
the fourth post-operative day and was found to have urine flowing out of
her corrugated drain. An intravenous pyelogram, a cystoscopy and a retrograde
pyelogram which were done showed a transection of the lower end of the
right ureter.
Primary urinary diversion and drainage of urine was done via a percutaneous
nephrostomy and a suprapubic catheter. This was left for three months and
changed periodically and finally followed by a definitive re-implantation
of the ureter using a Boari flap. The patient stayed in hospital for three
months. She was well five years later.
Case 8
This 48-year-old patient had a total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral
salpingo-oophorectomy performed for uterine fibroids. A clamp-release injury
of the lower right ureter was recognised intra-operatively.
Immediate ureteric catheterisation was done and replacement of this
by a double-J silicone stent was done three days later. This was left for
six weeks to provide drainage of urine. The patient was allowed home on
the seventh post-operative day and was asymptomatic. She had a normal intravenous
pyelogram after the double-J stent was removed six weeks later. She was
well 6 months later.
RESULTS
Success was measured by absence of symptoms and normal intravenous
pyelograms or micturating cystograms on follow-up. The length of hospital
stay for the six patients who had early definitive repair ranged from 10
to 14 days. There were no deaths from the series. There was also no renal
impairment due to the injuries sustained and only one case of urinary tract
infection which was treated.
The five ureteral injuries that were repaired within 30 days of the
primary gynaecological operation were all successful. Normal intravenous
pyelograms were demonstrated in the follow-up period which ranged from
six months to five years. The patients were symptom-free at the last follow-up.
The patient who initially had urinary diversion before repair also recovered
fully but had the additional inconvenience of a prolonged hospital stay
with a percutaneous nephrostomy and a suprapubic catheter for three months
before successful repair was done.
The two vesico-vaginal fistulae that were repaired early within 30 days
of the injury occurring via the trans-peritoneal route did well. Micturating
cystograms and intravenous pyelograms were normal and there were no more
symptoms. No stress incontinence was reported. However in the case where
initial drainage and subsequent cysto-diathermy were performed, the patient
failed to heal and complained of persistent leaking per vaginum on and
off. This patient defaulted after having been seen only once at follow-up.
Follow-up/Complications
Follow-up period ranged from six months to 5 years (mean: 2 years).
There were no major complication in the patients follow-up. One patient
had an abdominal stitch sinus formation which was explored and excised.
DISCUSSION
The source of the gynaecologist’s concern during operation is the retroperitoneal
course of the ureters in close continuity with the infundibulopelvic ligament
at the pelvic brim and the close relationship of the ureters to the uterine
arteries and cervix. The close application of the bladder and urethra to
the lower anterior part of the ureters and anterior vagina also predispose
these to be damaged during rough handling.
The presentation of urological injuries is usually within the first
two weeks of the injury when patients may complain of abdominal pain and
distension, wound leak, leaking per vaginum or urinary incontinence. If
recognised intra-operatively they should be dealt with immediately. Any
case of unexplained fever, loin pain or haematuria occurring post-operatively
should alert the gynaecologist to the possibility of damage to the urinary
tract. Any suspected case of injury should have intravenous urograms, micturating
cystograms or cystoscopy with retrograde pyelograms done to determine the
exact site and type of injury. Most often injuries occur unilaterally in
either ureter and are distal to the pelvic brim, as occurred in this series
of patients. Bladder injuries occur commonly when it is being separated
from the uterus during hysterectomy, resulting in vesico-vaginal fistulae
which can be high, mid or low.
Having diagnosed the injuries, much controversy exist as to the actual
timing of definitive surgery. Repair can be either undertaken immediately
ie intra-operatively or within 10 - 70 days of the primary gynaecological
operation(2) or delayed
with initial drainage or urinary diversion first.
Yet some authors advocate a totally conservative approach where a ureteral
or urinary catheter is left for as long as possible anticipating spontaneous
healing. The patient with a mid to high vesico-vaginal fistula treated
conservatively with an indwelling Foley’s catheter for six weeks failed
to heal and subsequently defaulted after staying 53 days in hospital.
Some surgeons prefer proximal urinary diversion as an initial step and
a later repair when tissues appear better healed. The patient with a ureteric
injury and who had initial urinary drainage in this series did well but
stayed three months in hospital.
Still others would recommend immediate and definitive repair as an
early direct intervention of the injury. This was the case for the six
other patients who had definitive repair done within 30 days of the urological
injury. Their outcomes were successful with a shortened hospital stay of
about 10 - 14 days. In recent years, this early aggressive form of management
has met with good success rates and shorter hospital stay and morbidity
for the patient(2,3).
In conclusion, favourable results have been shown in this small series
of early aggressive management of ureteral and bladder injuries. Prevention
is the hallmark of gynaecological surgery where urological injuries are
concerned but if damage should occur, it is important to recognise it early
and have it treated definitively. Early management should be undertaken
10 - 70 days after the initial primary gynaecological operation(3)
ie from the time when the injury occurred with a bias for earlier intervention
when competent urological expertise is readily available. Delay compromises
the tissues and thus the repair. This form of management provides excellent
results and shortens the length of hospital stay for the patient. Her early
and rapid return to normality helps prevent the much feared litigation
which so often follows treatment that is delayed or which caused prolonged
suffering before the fault is rectified.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
We would like to thank Ms Connie Cheng for her time spent in typing
this manuscript.
|