REFERENCES
1. Maruri F, Azziz R. Laparoscopic surgery for ectopic pregnancies: technology assessment and public health implications. Fertil Steril 1993; 59:487.
2. Ewen S, Nair S, Henderson A, Sutton C. Problems in the management of ectopic pregnancy: laparoscopy versus laparotomy in diagnosis and treatment. Gynaecological Endoscopy 1994; 3:105.
3. Drife JO. Tubal pregnancy. Rising incidence, earlier diagnosis, more conservative treatment. Br Med J 1990; 301:1057.
4. Kim DS, Chung SR, Park ML, Kim YP. Comparative review of diagnostic accuracy in tubal pregnancy: A 14 years survey of 1040 cases. Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 70:547.
5. Shapiro HL, Adler DH. Excision of an ectopic pregnancy through the laparoscope. Am J Obstet Gynaecol 1973; 117:290.
6. Baumann R, Magos AL, Turnbull A. Prospective comparison of videopelviscopy with laparotomy for ectopic pregnancy. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1991; 98:765.
7. Reich H, Freifeld ML, McGlynn F, Reich E. Laparoscopic treatment of tubal pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol 1987; 69:275.
8. Mao JF, Xiang XD. Laparoscopic injection of Methotrexate for unruptured ectopic pregnancy. Shanghai Medicine 1993; 9:327.
9. Foong C, Cormell R, Gangar K, Bridgwood P, Wright J. A comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional surgery in the management of ectopic pregnancy. Gynaecol Endos 1995; 4:21.
10. Meyer WR, Decherney AH. Laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. Ballieres Clinical Obstetrics and Gynecology 1989; 3:583.
11. Pouly JL, Chapron C, Mage G. The drop in the levels of hCG after conservative laparoscopic treatment of ectopic pregnancy. J Gynaecol Surg 1991; 4:211.